You Decide: Was Branch Hit A Penalty?

Neomam Admin

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Nov 04, 2024

37 visitor like this post

Share

You Decide: Was Branch Hit a Penalty?

The 2023 NFL season has been filled with controversial calls, but few have sparked as much debate as the hit on Seattle Seahawks quarterback Geno Smith by Los Angeles Rams defensive back Cobie Durant in Week 5. The play, which saw Durant deliver a blow to Smith's head as he was throwing the ball, was initially flagged for a penalty, but after review, the flag was picked up, leaving many fans and analysts wondering: Was it a penalty?

The Play: A Controversial Call

The play in question occurred in the first quarter with the Seahawks driving deep into Rams territory. As Smith dropped back to pass, Durant closed in, making contact with the quarterback's head as he released the ball. The officials immediately threw a flag for a penalty, but after reviewing the play, they reversed the call, ruling that Durant's hit was a legal tackle.

The Arguments: Two Sides of the Coin

The controversy surrounding the play stems from the differing interpretations of the NFL's rules regarding targeting. Here's a breakdown of the arguments:

For a Penalty:

• Targeting the head: Many argued that Durant's hit clearly targeted Smith's head, regardless of whether he was throwing the ball. The play was deemed dangerous and should have been penalized for player safety.
• Clear intent to make contact with the head: While Durant may not have aimed specifically for Smith's head, the trajectory of his hit undeniably made contact with the quarterback's head.
• Lack of a "football move": Some argue that Durant didn't make a "football move" to tackle Smith, as his hit was primarily focused on Smith's head, not his body.

Against a Penalty:

• Focus on the throw: The defense argues that Durant was focused on preventing the pass and that Smith's head was simply in the way as he attempted to make the tackle.
• Not a "targeting" hit: Some believe that the hit was not a "targeting" hit as Durant's initial contact was not solely focused on Smith's head.
• Difficult to call in real-time: The officials on the field may have had a difficult time making a call in real-time, as the hit was quick and the contact with the head was not immediately clear.

The Aftermath: A Heated Debate

The overturned call sparked a heated debate on social media and among analysts, with many fans and players expressing their frustration with the officiating. Some argued that the NFL's targeting rules are too vague and inconsistent, leading to a lack of clarity and predictable penalties.

The Takeaway: A Complex Issue with No Easy Answers

The question of whether the hit on Geno Smith was a penalty remains a complex issue. While the officials' call was overturned after review, many believe the play should have been penalized for targeting. The debate highlights the ongoing challenges of interpreting and applying the NFL's targeting rules, which are designed to protect player safety but often leave room for interpretation. Ultimately, the controversy surrounding the play serves as a reminder of the subjective nature of officiating in the NFL and the need for greater clarity regarding the rules.