UFC Edmonton: See The Judges' Scorecards

Neomam Admin

You need 2 min read

·

Post on Nov 03, 2024

40 visitor like this post

Share

UFC Edmonton: See the Judges' Scorecards

The Octagon was hot in Edmonton, Alberta as UFC Fight Night 221 delivered a night of thrilling battles and surprising upsets. But the true drama unfolded not in the cage, but on the judges' scorecards.

Controversial Decisions Spark Debate:

As with many UFC events, the judges' scores were the subject of heated debate among fans and fighters alike. Some decisions were clear-cut, while others left everyone questioning the judges' criteria. Let's take a closer look at the most discussed scorecards:

**Fight 1: ** A.J. Dobson vs. Marc Diakiese

This was a classic back-and-forth battle that went the distance, leaving fans on the edge of their seats. Dobson ultimately secured a split decision victory, but the judges' scorecards were far from unanimous.

Judges' Scorecards:

• Judge 1: Dobson 29-28
• Judge 2: Diakiese 29-28
• Judge 3: Dobson 29-28

Fight 2: Elise Reed vs. Gillian Robertson

Another close fight that went the distance, this one saw Reed emerge victorious with a split decision. Many fans felt that Robertson had done enough to earn the win, making the judges' decision a controversial one.

Judges' Scorecards:

• Judge 1: Robertson 29-28
• Judge 2: Reed 29-28
• Judge 3: Reed 29-28

Fight 3: Mike Malott vs. Yohan Lainesse

This fight, which headlined the main card, ended in a controversial split decision victory for Malott. While Malott landed some significant strikes, Lainesse controlled the majority of the fight, leading many to believe he deserved the win.

Judges' Scorecards:

• Judge 1: Lainesse 29-28
• Judge 2: Malott 29-28
• Judge 3: Malott 29-28

Why are Judges' Decisions So Controversial?

UFC judging has always been a hot topic. The subjective nature of scoring makes it difficult for judges to be completely objective. This can lead to discrepancies in scoring, causing fans to question the decisions.

Here are some of the factors contributing to the debate:

• Different Interpretation of Scoring Criteria: Each judge may have a different understanding of what constitutes a significant strike, control, and damage.
• Lack of Transparency: While the UFC provides official scorecards, there is little to no explanation for why the judges made the decisions they did.
• Bias: While not always the case, there is always a possibility of unconscious bias affecting the judges' scoring.

Looking Ahead:

While the debate about UFC judging will likely continue, it is important to remember that it is a subjective sport. The judges are tasked with making difficult decisions in real time, and sometimes they get it wrong.

Regardless of the controversy, UFC Edmonton provided another night of high-octane action, reminding us why we love the sport.

Do you agree with the judges' decisions? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!